Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins.

TitleMolecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2007
AuthorsMészáros, B., P. Tompa, I. Simon, and Z. Dosztányi
JournalJ Mol Biol
Date Published2007 Sep 14
Type of Articleidp
KeywordsBinding Sites, Conserved Sequence, Databases, Protein, Evolution, Molecular, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Models, Chemical, Protein Binding, Proteins, Static Electricity, Surface Properties, Thermodynamics

Thorough knowledge of the molecular principles of protein-protein recognition is essential to our understanding of protein function at the cellular level. Whereas interactions of ordered proteins have been analyzed in great detail, complexes of intrinsically unstructured/disordered proteins (IUPs) have hardly been addressed so far. Here, we have collected a database of 39 complexes of experimentally verified IUPs, and compared their interfaces with those of 72 complexes of ordered, globular proteins. The characteristic differences found between the two types of complexes suggest that IUPs represent a distinct molecular implementation of the principles of protein-protein recognition. The interfaces do not differ in size, but those of IUPs cover a much larger part of the surface of the protein than for their ordered counterparts. Moreover, IUP interfaces are significantly more hydrophobic relative to their overall amino acid composition, but also in absolute terms. They rely more on hydrophobic-hydrophobic than on polar-polar interactions. Their amino acids in the interface realize more intermolecular contacts, which suggests a better fit with the partner due to induced folding upon binding that results in a better adaptation to the partner. The two modes of interaction also differ in that IUPs usually use only a single continuous segment for partner binding, whereas the binding sites of ordered proteins are more segmented. Probably, all these features contribute to the increased evolutionary conservation of IUP interface residues. These noted molecular differences are also manifested in the interaction energies of IUPs. Our approximation of these by low-resolution force-fields shows that IUPs gain much more stabilization energy from intermolecular contacts, than from folding, i.e. they use their binding energy for folding. Overall, our findings provide a structural rationale to the prior suggestions that many IUPs are specialized for functions realized by protein-protein interactions.

Alternate JournalJ. Mol. Biol.
PubMed ID17681540
Grant List / / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom